Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

The article attempts to correlate the two assumptions. I still think the majority of voting adults would say, no, you do not have to cater to gay weddings if your religious beliefs are violated. There are many ways to parse or skillfully phrase this question. This reminds me of some local tax increase bill, with the ballot so worded that to vote NO, will actually equal a YES vote FOR taxes.
Mind Games. People playing their mind games.


9 posted on 04/10/2015 9:35:39 AM PDT by lee martell (The sa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lee martell

Indeed


14 posted on 04/10/2015 9:37:45 AM PDT by Jagdgewehr (It will take blood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: lee martell

Manufactured Consensus.

I wish more people would learn what it means and how it works.


18 posted on 04/10/2015 9:42:34 AM PDT by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson