Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: apoliticalone

True, but in this case there is a far larger issue with the budgets for all of the armed forces and their air forces being insufficient for their mission requirements. Even if the Air Force Chief of Staff could find a way to save about $5 billion without retiring any air squadrons and their aircraft, the future budget cuts are going to put the A-10 and/or one or more other aircraft fleets on the chopping block again during the next few years. I’m looking at an Obama proposed budget that shrinks future discretionary Defense spending by a third in the next ten years. See:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2016/assets/tables.pdf


88 posted on 04/11/2015 8:00:13 AM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyX

If the USA political class was more concerned about defending our nation and borders literally and figuratively, instead of nation building and leaving footprints in every corner of the world, our military planners could create a coherent policy that would be effective and save us hundreds of billions a year.

The military - congressional- industrial - surveillance complex has grown dependent upon perpetual mission creep, just as the crony capitalists have grown dependent on government bailouts and handouts, and just as has a large segment of society.

We need a major change in our political leadership philosophy most of whom have grown highly dependent on handouts from interests that are mostly not in America’s interest.


89 posted on 04/11/2015 9:42:44 AM PDT by apoliticalone (Be the person that your dog thinks you are. ( saw it as a bumper sticker))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson