Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paid_Russian_Troll

I still maintain that the F-35 cannot fulfill the mission of the A-10. The F-35 is not the be all do all is is promoted to be.


58 posted on 04/10/2015 9:39:53 AM PDT by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Doc91678

True, I actually don’t advocate getting rid of a-10. F-35 would fall out of skies at much higher rate being assigned to the same mission.


61 posted on 04/10/2015 9:58:21 AM PDT by Paid_Russian_Troll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: Doc91678

“I still maintain that the F-35 cannot fulfill the mission of the A-10. The F-35 is not the be all do all is is promoted to be.”

Whether it can or not, what does that have to do with the retirement of the A-10? If you don’t retire the A-10, which of the other squadrons are you going to retire instead, the entire fleet of B-1 bombers, the remaining B-52 bombers, the F-15 fighters or fighter-bombers, some more of the F-16 fighters or fighter-bombers, the AWACs, the air refueling squadrons, or some other squadrons?


62 posted on 04/10/2015 10:21:35 AM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson