Now that it’s come to light that the White House doesn’t take its foreign policy seriously but considers it all a big joke, how can foreign-policy experts discuss the Obama foreign policy seriously?
It’s absurd for the Council on Foreign Relations, for example, to publish learned articles on Obama’s dealings with the world when such dealings are being orchestrated by a White House staff of teenage goofballs playing around with the Internet.
And what about the foreign-policy experts and columnists at the New York Times and other liberal publications? It’s laughable for them to continue to treat Obama as a serious policymaker. His obsessive public attacks on Bibi Netanyahu are the bullying taunts of a disturbed third grader not statements of substance that deserve serious interpretation.
One of the main reasons why individuals do interventions on family members is so that they can work out their problems in private in mental institutions without embarrassing themselves and those close to them. Instead, the Left has continually given Obama free rein to do the most foolish, embarrassing, self-destructive things imaginable for a chief executive in full view of the world, and now it’s come to this.
They don't.
Dr. Richard Haase, president of the CFR, has already written in the Times about the incompetence of Obama's foreign policy team.
Shortly thereafter, Leslie Gelb, also of the CFR, wrote an op-ed in the Times demanding the firing of Valerie Jarrett and Susan Rice, and the placing of Obama's foreign policy in receivership in the hands of John McCain and Lindsay Graham. Rush Limbaugh covered this op-ed extensively.
The Foreign Policy Community has also authored articles pointing out John Kerry as the worst Secretary of State in the past 50 years. The Community has given Obama's foreign policy team a Vote of No Confidence. Usually, a major scandal or a ride in an open motorcade in Dallas is the next step.