She’s claiming that she was tricked into unknowingly providing false testimony. Which is different than lying under oath/perjury in an act of commission.
The responsibility here lies on the prosecutor, not her.
Fitzgerald. Chicago. Democrat.
No, nothing suspicious there.
Oh, no it doesn’t preclude her from responsibility.
She only now deduces that she has been “tricked”? Only now after the statutes of limitations has been effected? Only now with a book advance under her belt, and more big money to come? She should have been kicking and screaming on behalf of her book’s protagonist long, long ago, before it was profitable, before the statute of limitations.