Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If you want to know, Sally Kohn is also a distinguished Vaid Fellow at the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute.
1 posted on 04/07/2015 7:09:21 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: SeekAndFind

What a f#%^&ing retard.
People like this used to get drummed into oblivion for spouting such insipid drivel.
Now they are celebrated as ‘courageous’. All because they are gay.
This country has a cancer - the left.


104 posted on 04/07/2015 10:12:09 AM PDT by No_More_Harkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

If religious liberty, enshrined in the First Amendment, is no longer valid, then neither is freedom of the press.

Sally Kohn is therefore required to stand before a camera and on-air recite a heterosexual wedding endorsement, disavowing support for homosexual ceremonies. She will be critiqued by a panel of conservatives.

Failure to be convincing in her sole support of hetero weddings is punishable by fines.

THAT is the analogous consequence to brainless dirtbags like Sally.


105 posted on 04/07/2015 10:17:34 AM PDT by MortMan (All those in favor of gun control raise both hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
The first is that a printer doesn’t have to make such signs, under any law, because refusing to do so is not discrimination in any legally prohibited sense.

Wrong. "God hates fags" is a religious statement. Refusing to print it would be trampling on the free exercise of what someone considers their religion.
106 posted on 04/07/2015 10:29:15 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“because refusing to do so is not discrimination in any legally prohibited sense.”

If the law defines discrimination, then why were there protests about the original RFRA allowing discrimination? If the law defines what is discrimination, then by definition a law cannot be discrimination.

If it was not for double standards, the left would have no standards at all.


107 posted on 04/07/2015 10:39:46 AM PDT by csivils
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

National Divorce. NOW!


111 posted on 04/07/2015 9:38:43 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://www.tedcruz.org/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson