Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea
Yeah, but the Maccabees wouldn't be considered "Apocrypha" if the Reformation-era publishers had kept the whole Bible!

:o)


35 posted on 04/05/2015 7:28:47 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Pizza be with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

:)! He is Risen! JMJ


47 posted on 04/05/2015 7:48:11 AM PDT by defconw (Fight all error, and do it with good humor, patience, kindness and love. -St. John Cantius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o

The original, 1611 edition of the King James Bible includes the ‘Apocrypha’. These books are included in the Bible we read from here at home (The Jerusalem Bible). Some books are omitted from these that I think should be included...Enoch, for instance. Jude quotes from Enoch in his short epistle.


111 posted on 04/05/2015 9:50:44 AM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson