Posted on 04/03/2015 9:05:34 AM PDT by Kaslin
In 1998, the Washington National Airport in Arlington, VA was renamed Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport – and local Democrats are still bitter about it.
The Washington Post recently conducted a survey of Washington, DC area residents, asking them what they prefer to call the busy airport. The results show that while younger people tend to call it by its current title, Reagan National, older, liberal commuters refuse to utter the name of the conservative president. In total, 72 percent of Republicans surveyed said they refer to it as 'Reagan' or 'Reagan National,' while only 35 percent of Democrats acknowledged the airport by that name.
Survey participant Jason West's eloquent explanation perhaps says it all.
“I’m still mad about the name, because of how it got passed. It got forced upon all the people here by a small group of powerful men in Congress,” says survey respondent Jason West, 57, a business analyst who lives in D.C.
“It’s almost like all those Republicans wanted to stick a middle finger up to all the people who live here,” West recalls. “I don’t know why [President Bill] Clinton didn’t veto it.”
Yeesh. Talk about being overly sensitive. I'm not the biggest fan of John F. Kennedy or his policies, but am I going to stop calling New York City's main international airport JFK? Of course not.
Interestingly, it's not just commuters who are rejecting the 'Reagan National' title. One of President Reagan's most notable demonstrations while he served in the Oval Office has apparently left pilots with a bad taste in their mouths as well.
Reagan’s firing of 11,000 striking air traffic controllers in 1981 may also be why neither pilots nor air traffic controllers seem to use the airport’s proper name. When talking to pilots, air traffic controllers say DCA or National, says Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman Laura Brown, who didn’t speculate as to why that is. Pilots tend to say “Washington Tower” or “National Tower.”
That's right. Because of a decision made over 30 years ago that, in context, was a fair one, (Reagan warned the striking pilots they would lose their job if they didn't return to work), pilots flying into DC today reject his name.
WaPo did manage, however, to find at least one DC resident who had some common sense. Chris Sloan, 50, is a banker from Connecticut and happens to be a Republican, yet his reason for calling the airport 'Reagan' has nothing to do with his party.
“I don’t call it Reagan because of my political affiliation,” Sloan says. “I call it Reagan because that’s the name of the airport.”
A liberal who is bold enough to call it the 'Reagan airport' does not have to worry about their conscience - it's just a name. They are not denouncing their long held beliefs; they're taking a mode of transportation.
If you still refuse to let go of grudges or bitterness toward the 40th president and can't even fly from an airport named Reagan, go fly a kite.
These morons would love to have the airport....Renamed for Obama, but thus far seem afraid to speak of that part of their bitter malcontent
DIMs/LIBs are insufferable losers.
DIMs/LIBs are insufferable losers.
freaking cry babies.
Didn't think so.
Libs are often so petty and thin-skinned. Obama and Hillary are perfect examples of this.
When I was first going to DC about seven years ago now, a
Ot , if not most, would refer to it as National.
But if I called it Reagan they would tend to also call it Reagan.
It’s like there was a peer pressure.
You post left-tard cultural values.
You are completely compromised by the left but don’t seem to know it.
What gets lost in the bitter partisan argument here is that Washington National was given the “Reagan” name as part of a larger deal between Clinton and the 1990’s Gingrich Congress that saw buildings named and renamed for Democrats as well.
Iirc naming the DoJ building for RFK was part of that deal. I think there were a couple buildings renamed for LBJ as well.
Same thing with how CVN-76 was named after Reagan. CVN-75, laid down as the USS United States was renamed the Harry S Truman.
Well folks, we got us our own Chinese like cultural revolution brewing here. This is just the beginning.
If Reagan is ever removed; REPLACE IT WITH CRUZ!
Amusingly, the crew of the USS Jimmy Carter refers to their sub as “The -23 Boat”
I could support that.
I would have a problem with “Washington National”....since the airport lies on Arlington soil (Virginia).
Perhaps...Robert E. Lee International instead?
Maybe these people ought to go and worry about their Washington Redskins....who don’t play in Washington and none of the players pay Washington income taxes.
Right after removing the Kennedy name from John F. Kennedy International Airport.
I knew “Reagan Airport” wouldn’t last.
Fat chance. You do something petulant like that when you are in the majority. May Dems remain on permanent pout as a permanent minority.
Reagan rocks and always will, whether his name is visible or not, and that’s exactly why they are in a twist against him.
Republicans keeping his name alive is more than the Marx crowd can bear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.