[FrankR]

“Many feel the law, which advocates say is intended to protect religious freedom, will result in discrimination against homosexuals. . .”

Difference is, the Constitution protects Religion, but it says nothing about gays having the right to hijack and extort private businesses...

[Steve_Seattle]

"Many feel the law, which advocates say is intended to protect religious freedom, will result in discrimination against homosexuals. . .”

Somebody should just say, instead of backpedaling and clearing their throat, that, "Yes, in a very small number of cases, it will, and virtually all of those cases will involve a refusal to service gay weddings by business owners with strong religious views against gay marriage. The law will have little if any impact on the ability of gays to conduct their everyday business just as they always have.

And, although we can call this "discrimination," it is pretty much the same sort of discrimination that everyone uses every day when they make moral choices.

When liberals boycott Hobby Lobby, they are discriminating.

When colleges divest from oil companies, they are discriminating.

When a musician refuses to perform at a Republican event, he is discriminating.

When a liberal ad agency turns down a cigarette company, it is discriminating.

When a newspaper rejects an ad or an op-ed piece, it is discriminating.

When the mayor of Seattle prohibits city-employee travel to Indiana, he is discriminating.

Got it?

[Viennacon]

Indiana completely caved. So the Republican party of Indiana DIRECTLY DECLARES they are for the legal persecution of Christians. It is time to LEAVE the f***** party now!