Well, that’s rather academic isn’t it?
Nobody orders pizza for weddings, especially not homos. They would never hear the end of that from the crowd they run with.
In World War II Quakers would join - but only to be medics. They have a fierce objection to war... is that to be stripped too?
Hey you boobs at New York Times... let's balance out your bullsh*t... Washington Post? O'Reilly?
Unless I’m mistaken about what this kind of bill means, I wouldn’t say it’s academic. If I understand it right, I see this bill as preserving the “conscience” of a Christian owner of a business from serving or doing business with a person who violates that “religious conscience” by who they are or what they represent or what they stand for. SO, in that sense, it is NOT TARGETED at gays, but all sorts of other things that would violate the “Christian’s conscience”!
A sampling of some other things I can think of, in which one would DENY SERVICE to people, would be a group coming in for Pizza who supports ABORTION! That would really violate a Chriatian’s conscience.
Or, if a Mormon church group came in and had an “after church Pizza gathering” some Sunday afternoon. I would DENY THEM SERVICE as they are one of the largest CULT GROUPS in America ... and as far as I’m concerned Mormons shouldn’t get service from ANY CHRISTIAN BUSINESS WHATSOEVER, ANYWHERE!!
If Mitt Romney were to come in to that Pizza place he SHOULD BE DENIED SERVICE because of clearly being a Mormon!
I would DENY SERVICE to GLENN BECK, too, for his Mormonism!
SO ... it doesn’t appear to be academic to me, but VERY REAL and opens the door to CHRISTIAN BUSINESS to serving Christians and not VIOLATING their religious conscience!