Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus
By the way, none of the people who had standing to challenge Barack Obama’s eligibility because they could show DIRECT injury from him being elected filed suit against him.
I realize that this is the interpretation of the marxists and cowards in the judiciary, but anyone with a lick of common sense knows in their bones that a bogus president usurping the presidency directly injures each and every citizen. You, me and every sovereign citizen has an individual right to be served by a legitimate president -- that a usurper denies all of us that right is the first direct injury.

The next direct injury occurs with his first putative act that directly restricts, reduces or adversely affects the rights a citizen. A usurper inflicts those injuries only upon the individuals directly affected, but by now aka obama has probably caused direct damage to almost everyone in the USA. Lack of standing in this case is a cruel, conspiratorial tyranny of the judicial lapdogs of the power brokers in DC and beyond.

130 posted on 04/03/2015 10:53:58 AM PDT by elengr (Benghazi betrayal: rescue denied - our guys DIED - treason's the reason obama s/b tried then fried!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: elengr

The Republican National Committee challenged Republican Party New Hampshire primary election voter Fred Hollander on grounds of lack of standing in March, 2008, months before there was any challenge in court to Obama.
Hollander claimed John McCain was ineligible due to birth in Panama.
There has been no difference between conservative judges and liberal judges in rulings on standing. Conservative judges are even more likely to limit who can resolve political questions via the courts because they believe in limited government.
http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/documents/Hollander-Order-7-24-08.pdf

It is the responsibility of attorneys to find plaintiffs who will not have issues with standing. The way judges tend to look at it, 70 million Americans wanted Obama to be the president and were not “injured” by his election.

Also, there is no issue of standing in CRIMINAL court, only in civil court. If anyone in America wants to be able to bring a legal action, find a prosecutor willing to pursue election fraud, fraud, identity theft, forgery or document tampering charges against an illegal candidate or public official.


132 posted on 04/03/2015 12:05:34 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson