[Junk Silver]

What “anti-gay” law is that?

Progressives have mastered the science of using language to constantly reinforce ideology and thus winning arguments just by starting them.

I’m more interested in the “Pro-Totalitarian-Fascism” internet regulations recently proposed by the FCC.

[nascarnation]

Since those FCC regs are ultimately intended to enrich members of the Obama regime, I doubt we’ll hear much in the MSM.

[HiTech RedNeck]

It dares to provide support for a small set of situations (e.g. Christian baker and homo wedding, possibly some bed and breakfasts) where the homo crowd will not be able to run roughshod over the faith of the proprietor against the proprietor’s will.

If anything, it will save the homo crowd from a lot of hatred that it would otherwise have earned. Go bugger if you must, we have warned you, but we will not make the police stop you. However, do not presume to bugger our practices of our faiths or we will make you stop.

[Sooth2222]

"What “anti-gay” law is that?"

This one?

WaPo: "19 states that have ‘religious freedom’ laws like Indiana’s that no one is boycotting"

[Southside_Chicago_Republican]

Progressives have mastered the science of using language to constantly reinforce ideology and thus winning arguments just by starting them.

Also known as lying, and counting on there being enough ignorance among the masses to make the lie stick.

[IDontLikeToPayTaxes]

Progressives have mastered the science of using language to constantly reinforce ideology and thus winning arguments just by starting them.

Indeed they have. I wish our side would wise up and use more aggressive tactics.