Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cotton1706
The way I remember it we were supposed to all kinda go along with Harry Reid as majority leader back in 2010 when Sharron (sp?) Angle ran against him.

After all, the NRA had Reid in their pocket, so we were told, and the fix was in against Angle with the Republican establishment. (Don't run a serious campaign against the Dem leadership, and they'll return the favor to us... one hand washes the other, y'know what I'm sayin'? )

She wasn't a perfect candidate, but she was a Republican candidate, however the rationale that was sold to the voters was "well, if we really support Sharron Angle against Reid and she wins, we'll get stuck with Chuckie as (at that time) majority leader."

Now we're getting Chuckie anyway, except as minority leader for now but as this article points out at the beginning, possibly as majority leader sometime in the future. Entirely plausible given the feckless Republican leadership especially in the Senate.

A sincere thanks again to the Republican machine, Chris Cox, and the NRA. Way to go, guys, you only squandered a Senate seat for six years, and substituted Dingy Harry for Chuckie for the same length of time, and confirmed the craven fecklessness of the Republican machine.

20 posted on 03/28/2015 8:03:59 AM PDT by OKSooner ("Remember Fort Hood, Boston, and Moore, Oklahoma.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: OKSooner

Yup. Not only did they not support Angle, but they pretty declined to run anybody against Schumer. And they won’t run anybody against Schumer again in 2016.


22 posted on 03/28/2015 8:09:16 AM PDT by cotton1706 (ThisRepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson