Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurkinanloomin
Absolutely nothing will come of this.

I might agree with you and the other doomsayers on this thread, except that The New York Times broke this story, no matter their reasons for doing so. No doubt they intend to aggressively follow it through. They still want to sell papers.

132 posted on 03/27/2015 7:34:34 PM PDT by JennysCool (My hypocrisy goes only so far)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: JennysCool
Absolutely nothing will come of this.

"I might agree with you and the other doomsayers on this thread, except that The New York Times broke this story, no matter their reasons for doing so. No doubt they intend to aggressively follow it through. They still want to sell papers."

The New York Times has put agenda over profits for at least 30 years. This shows that the administration wants Hillary gone. The Obama administration has no love of the Clintons, and they want their chosen successor in the White House. I do not know who that will be; but this tactic of destroying the opposition candidate by leaking damaging information to a friendly media has been how Obama has won most of his elections, especially those in Chicago. It is what the Obama administration does.

186 posted on 03/28/2015 10:02:21 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson