Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: econjack
1) So politicians could off-shore all the jobs in my area, and disenfranchise me from voting? No thanks. You're assumption that everybody that didn't pay taxes is voluntarily out of work is not a good one. What about elderly? You're going to disenfranchise them? What about disabled veterans? You're going to disenfranchise them too?

2) Be careful what you ask for. Who makes the current events test? While the concept seems good, the devil's in the implementation. You're likely to end up with questions that have liberal talking points as answers instead of well rounded current events?


12 posted on 03/27/2015 6:57:36 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DannyTN
2) Be careful what you ask for. Who makes the current events test?

From the Democrats, I'd expect questions like:

1. What are Kim Kardassian's hip measurements?
2. Who much money do the stars on Big Bang make each episode?
3. What religion does Tom Cruise belong to?
4. Who was the last Bachelorette?

14 posted on 03/27/2015 7:26:28 AM PDT by aimhigh (1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

I’m elderly and I still pay taxes, both on SS and earned income. I’m not sure about the tax status of disability benefits. As to the current events tests, what I was really looking for is what the current batch of candidates stand for...what’s their stance on issues of the day. I don’t know who would make up the questions, but I guess it would be some bi-partisan group. Regardless, I’m hard-pressed to understand why my tax dollars are used to buy cell phones for people, unless it’s to buy votes. The recipients’ extent of knowledge often seems to be: “Who do I get the most free stuff from?” and politicians behave accordingly.

As to the income restriction, maybe we draw on Neal Bortz idea that everyone gets one vote, but for every $10K you pay in taxes, you get another vote, up to a max of, say, 5 votes. The Constitution originally restricted voting to property owners, mainly because of vested rights. I’m not as sure as you that they were wrong.


16 posted on 03/27/2015 7:50:00 AM PDT by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson