The judge participating in this most recent case of Amish persecution in Wisconsin is Judge Kristina Bourget. To my chagrin she was initially appointed to her seat by our Governor Walker. Now she aspires to win an election to the Wisconsin Court of Appeals on April 7th. She would become the judge to whom Amish families like this would place their hopes for appeal before. And she would dash their hopes. She has made it clear in this case she has no intention of protecting our Christian religious freedoms or the free exercise thereof. She has failed to understand the God given rights afforded us by our Constitution. Such an individual should not have a seat in a court of appeals. I would strongly caution my fellow Wisconsites against raising her to this next level. She is opposed on April 7th by Mark Seidl, and I for one would encourage all District III voters to get out the vote for him instead. Please do your diligence and consider protesting Bourget by voting for Seidl.
1 posted on
03/26/2015 7:28:21 PM PDT by
so_real
To: so_real
Thanks for the background.
To: so_real
thank you for your input Mrs seidl
3 posted on
03/26/2015 7:34:13 PM PDT by
terycarl
(common sense prevails over all)
To: so_real
Specifically, what building codes are they violating? Are they refusing to wire the house for electricity or communications? I would expect that any wiring would have to conform to code, but is absence of wiring a violation?
6 posted on
03/26/2015 7:39:12 PM PDT by
RhoTheta
(US foreign policy under BO: 'Talk butchly and carry a small twig.' -- Mark Steyn)
To: so_real
Building permits are for revenue, and to reassess for future tax.
Building code is to protect future buyers, kind of.
Pay the tax, be forbidden from re-selling.
7 posted on
03/26/2015 7:40:03 PM PDT by
Scrambler Bob
(an icon of resistance within the oppressed patriots, who represent resilience in the face of SSV)
To: so_real
They could start camping out. The seasons are improving for such. Even in Wisc.
8 posted on
03/26/2015 7:42:45 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: so_real
What building codes were against their beliefs?
9 posted on
03/26/2015 7:43:07 PM PDT by
Clint N. Suhks
(Bibi is the President we wish we had.)
To: so_real
So, what’s different about this home from other, legal homes? Does anyone know?
11 posted on
03/26/2015 7:45:18 PM PDT by
kitkat
(STORM HEAVEN WITH PRAYERS FOR OUR COUNTRY)
To: so_real
We need to reestablish property rights in this country. Your home is no longer your castle.
Dozens of petite tyrants rule your life.
It’s their house. Let them live in it how they want.
12 posted on
03/26/2015 7:45:38 PM PDT by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: so_real
A remarkably inadequate article.
After some googling, it appears the question at issue is whether they will install, or sign permits agreeing to install, smoke and CO detectors.
To: so_real
Maybe install smoke detectors but not the batteries?
Without a battery it’s not an electrical device..it’s just an inert object.
Did you install smoke detectors?
Yes.
25 posted on
03/26/2015 9:24:46 PM PDT by
Bobalu
(If we live to see 2017 we will be kissing the ground)
To: so_real; All
In a news piece the other day, at the very end, it quietly said that a fracking outfit was offering the Amish generous money for their lands.
2 +2= ?
29 posted on
03/26/2015 11:18:06 PM PDT by
maine-iac7
(Christian is as Christian does - by their fruits ye shall know them.)
To: so_real
Just out of curiosity, what do the laws that are on the books say about it? Is the judge legislating from the bench by reinterpreting existing law or is the judge refusing to legislate from the bench by following current law?
I don't know much about it, but it doesn't serve to let emotions get in the way of trains of thought.
30 posted on
03/27/2015 3:56:19 AM PDT by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson