Replies

I’ve got a question about this post by Sven, from another thread:

“The American people voted to install an ineligible President on Jan. 20, 2009, void the US Constitution, void the United States Code, fire all US executive and judicial federal officers from all three branches of government, except Obama and Biden, and fire executive and judicial officers of the various states.

The votes, bills, proclamations or any other product of the legislatures of the various states have been voided after the installation of an ineligible President.

Only the People of the United States, Obama and Biden have authority to call a convention for development of a national governing document.
“

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3274207/posts?page=72#72

My question:

If only the people & the VP & the prez remain,

and the executive and judicial feds, executive and judicial of all the states were fired by 0’s election,

and the US Code, and any product of the state legislature are void,

then how are we to convene a convention of the states?

Again pinging to #72 here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3274207/posts?page=72#72

In the last sentence of post #72, Sven is asking for a convention of the states to be headed up by 0, Biden, and ‘the people’.

0 and Biden

Did all y’all get the significance of that?

I never voted for those two characters, and I certainly would not want them heading up a convention of the states!!!

(I would wager many FReepers would not want them meddling either.)

Now that Orly Taitz has finally figured out evidence is discovered and not verified in Discovery, the court’s are dismissing her cases before discovery can begin. An Eligibility Clause challenge, like an Appointments Clause challenge, questions the sovereignty of the United States and should be addressed before any procedural rules or motions entered into the record by US federal officer with a vested interest in the outcome of the trial are entertained.

Our system of nominating, qualifying, voting, assigning Electors and the counting of the Electors’ votes is designed to make it difficult to elect an ineligible President, but not impossible. An ineligible President voids the sovereignty of the United States. The American people and the States delegated some of the sovereignty to the US federal government. The American people and the States can retain their sovereignty and terminate the sovereignty of the US federal government by electing an ineligible President.

From what I can tell, Obama and Biden plan to vacate the White House on Jan. 20, 2017. New leadership will restore an opportunity to re-establish a constitutional republic. Quite possibly a constitutional republic where life begins at conception, a balanced budget is a requirement for the federal government to continue to operate, the IRS is a faded memory, the EPA is a faded memory, the Energy Department is a faded memory, etc.

There are several canards popping up their heads in this thread.

(1) Ye Olde Indonesian Citizenship Red Herring:
Yeah, Lolo might have conferred Indonesian Citizenship on little Barry, but that would have no effect on his American Citizenship, if as an adult, Barry decided he wanted to be an American after all.

(2) This thing about Barry and The Terminator taking the Oath of Citizenship on the same day is certainly interesting bar talk. This just come up?

(3) Barry, having been sworn in by the CJ of the SCOTUS (2X), it would be most unrealistic to assume that the SCOTUS would turn around and have any desire to grant an appeal on the many cases involving "Natural Born Citizenship" etc. In effect, Barry's terms as POTUS have been confirmed in their legitimacy by the Courts, the Congress, the AsG of 50 States, and a majority of the voting public.

(4)With Rubio, Cruz, and Jindal stepping into the Presidential Arena, bold as brass, one can only conclude that the fuzzy notion of "Natural Born Citizenship," not to mention the legal basis (if any) of Birthright Citizenship of the children of illegal aliens, legal alien visitors, etc, have all been knocked into a nicely cocked hat. As of now, there really is no definition of "American Citizenship." The BC issued last night to innumerable children born in LA to illegal alien parents, is just as good as mine, yours, or Barack H. Obama's. Apparently, now we are all "Natural Born Citizens."

(5) As of right now, one is a "Natural Born Citizen" if:
(a) one is born here under any circumstances, or
(b) born anywhere in the world, but having one (1)parent who is an American Citizen.

As of right now, we live in a country without functional borders and mighty sketchy regulations (not laws) about "citizenship."

(6) About this SS#: I hope Dr. Taitz gets somewhere with this particular case. Her legal track record is a shambles, her pleadings most inept. In fact, I have the feeling that all of this stuff is kept alive for our benefit by highly organized Democrat Troll Operations, with the goal of distracting us from the main event, which is the destruction by degree of the Republic.

May I once again beg your kind indulgence to point out that we already know that the present recumbent in the WH is a no-good queer commie who only does what he is told? What we don't know is what the hell is next. How, and with whom, and by what authority is the dirty stinking mess left behind by this administration going to be cleaned up? Where's the Program. Where's the Plan? Who's going to Lead?