Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

If it was terrorism, I’m surprised he didn’t ditch it into a populated area.

Nothing seems to add up.


34 posted on 03/25/2015 5:25:29 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Rutles4Ever

Controlled descent with one pilot seems to indicate suicide/terrorism. Unlikely the flight deck lost pressure at exact moment a pilot left it.


46 posted on 03/25/2015 5:29:33 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

Damned good point.


104 posted on 03/25/2015 6:03:53 PM PDT by sparklite2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever
"If it was terrorism, I’m surprised he didn’t ditch it into a populated area.

The co-pilot needed to lock out the pilot at the first opportunity he was given. When nature's call caused the pilot to leave the cockpit, that was the opportunity the co-pilot needed. Flying the plane over to a populated city for the crash, would have added a layer of complexity. The co-pilot wanted to do it quick and simple.

The idea of a incident happening to incapacitate the co-pilot at just the time the pilot left the cockpit, seems to be a coincidence with high statistical odds. If they recover the body of the co-pilot, I hope they do an autopsy.

327 posted on 03/26/2015 3:47:09 AM PDT by jonrick46 (America's real drug problem: other people's money (the Commutist's opium addiction).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson