[tcrlaf]

“Hope that’s not true. Big mistake if it is.”

Actually, NO...

1) The law now REQUIRES you to have health Insurance.

2) He can counter lib claims by saying “I’m ON Obamacare. ARE YOU?????”

3) Gives him standing to file against it in court, as a “victim”, and even perhaps, testify in front of the Supremes about it???

By doing this, he’s cutting lib Obamacare attacks against Cruz off at the knees. Shrewd tactical move, and obviously pre-planned.

[PapaNew]

Look, if Cruz is the best guy, I hope he wins. My comment isn't about Cruz not being the best man for the job. He may very well be. My comments are about this particular tactic. Is it OK to disagree with that? Do we all have to bow down and blindly follow whoever our favorite candidate is, asking no questions? Not questioning politicians before or after they're in office is one way we've got ourselves into this mess.

He can counter lib claims by saying “I’m ON Obamacare. ARE YOU?????

If Obamacare is unconstitutional, which it surely is, it's hard to imagine that bragging about acquiescing to it is a good thing and then denouncing those who are not on it as a bad thing.

Look I agree with Rush Limbaugh that conservatives are already bashing Cruz because "conservatives" have a problem with needing somebody "perfect." That's not what I'm doing here. I'm questioning a tactic, not dissing him as the best candidate.