That’s exactly my point. You don’t need to acquiesce to an unconstitutional law to show and prove it is unconstitutional. The analogy works: saying you have to acquiesce to an unconstitutional law to show it is unconstitutional is like saying you have to get cancer before showing it is a deadly disease. That’s silly.
He isn’t acquiescing to anything. He he following current law.
If he does not do it then you must be claiming he take the Senate plan.
Walk that one out if you will.