Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaNew

I stumble on that “talk intelligently” part. I’m not conceding that you are doing that. I’ve no problem that you question his tactics, but you kept going back to “so what am I supposed to do?”

That’s an entirely different subject. And yet.....


114 posted on 03/24/2015 5:44:39 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright
[W]hat am I supposed to do and what the states are supposed to do with Obamacare is THE subject.

The states are to reject and nullify Obamacare and other unconstitutional federal acts. Not sure this tactic helps that cause. Try not to get too upset about this as a valid and relevant issue to his "political statement".

Also, don't get yourself too tangled up with he fact that you don't need to submit to an unconstitutional law to show it is unconstitutional. He seems to want to show how bad a law it is and how it doesn't work. But that's trying to prove Obamacare was the wrong way to do the wrong thing. Leaves open the possibility of a right way to do the wrong thing. Federally socialized medicine in whatever form is the wrong thing and patently unconstitutional. You don't need to sign up to prove that.

144 posted on 03/24/2015 6:36:14 PM PDT by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson