Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurkinanloomin
No one was interested in what Article II sec.1 meant when Obama ran.

That's a lie; those of us who were, were told to kindly shut up or wait for the proper time to challenge it or ignored or flatly dismissed.
The flat dismissal BTW is the favorite of the judiciary: nope, you don't have standing is a convenient way to dodge the issue.

28 posted on 03/23/2015 9:00:03 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark
No one was interested in what Article II sec.1 meant when Obama ran.

That's a lie; those of us who were, were told to “kindly shut up” or “wait for the proper time to challenge it” or ignored or flatly dismissed.

Now that it's a white conservative in question is the "proper time", right?

39 posted on 03/23/2015 9:04:55 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & Ifwater the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: OneWingedShark

I was one of those trying to educate as to what natural born citizen meant to the founders and why they used that phrase in the Constitution. Most people didn’t seem to care and those who could act refused for reasons unclear to me.

What difference, at this point, does it make?


63 posted on 03/23/2015 9:25:43 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson