Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I am a Climate Change Skeptic [Human Emissions Saved Planet]
heartland.org ^ | March 20, 2015 | Patrick Moore

Posted on 03/20/2015 8:46:38 PM PDT by grundle

Editor’s Note: Patrick Moore, Ph.D., has been a leader in international environmentalism for more than 40 years. He cofounded Greenpeace...

Human Emissions Saved Planet

Over the past 150 million years, carbon dioxide had been drawn down steadily (by plants) from about 3,000 parts per million to about 280 parts per million before the Industrial Revolution. If this trend continued, the carbon dioxide level would have become too low to support life on Earth. Human fossil fuel use and clearing land for crops have boosted carbon dioxide from its lowest level in the history of the Earth back to 400 parts per million today.

At 400 parts per million, all our food crops, forests, and natural ecosystems are still on a starvation diet for carbon dioxide. The optimum level of carbon dioxide for plant growth, given enough water and nutrients, is about 1,500 parts per million, nearly four times higher than today. Greenhouse growers inject carbon-dioxide to increase yields. Farms and forests will produce more if carbon-dioxide keeps rising.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.heartland.org ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: agw; climatechange; co2; environment; environmentalism; fertilizer; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; greenpeace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: relictele

Well actually, no I didn’t know what you meant if it was something other than what you said:

“The earth is 2/3 water i.e. deep oceans”

If you hadn’t added the “i.e. deep oceans” I would have known what you meant. But by adding depth, a third dimension, you were implying that the oceans were so deep that the earth was made up of 2/3 water, not just two dimensional area.


41 posted on 03/21/2015 4:21:38 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

No, I wasn’t really arguing.

It is just that so many claim that since the sun’s output only varies about 0.1% through the normal 11 year solar cycle that it couldn’t possibly be responsible for any significant change on Earth. My only point is a lot more is going on than just the total energy output changing, particularly with the solar winds.


42 posted on 03/21/2015 4:26:21 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DB

Oh my God.

Please avoid me at parties.

Actually, never mind. You don’t sound as if you’ve been to one.


43 posted on 03/21/2015 7:18:47 PM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: relictele

:-)

.


44 posted on 03/21/2015 7:23:09 PM PDT by Mears (To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."Voltaire))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: relictele

Words matter.

Nice how you go personal and insulting...

Don’t worry, I don’t care to know you either.


45 posted on 03/21/2015 8:04:46 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson