“Same-sex marriage and parenting withholds either a mother or father from a child while telling him or her that it doesn’t matter. That it’s all the same. But it’s not,” she writes. “A lot of us, a lot of your kids, are hurting. My father’s absence created a huge hole in me, and I ached every day for a dad. I loved my mom’s partner, but another mom could never have replaced the father I lost.”But while her argument is heartfelt, note some gay-parenting supporters, it’s also full of holes.
They didn't list any holes that I saw. The very next paragraph is merely a turdburglar homoagenda activist saying she is wrong.
So... that settles THAT?
WRONG!
Just because some fudgepacker says something about gay "marriage" doesn't mean he is some authority on the needs of children.
"They didn't list any holes that I saw. The very next paragraph is merely a turdburglar homoagenda activist saying she is wrong. So... that settles THAT?"
Does a lib ever support an argument with a few factual nuggets? Sounds like a typical exchange to me.