I’m assuming the positions you listed for Walker are after his “Whitehouse Road” conversion.
Prior to that, he has several quotes saying a border wall was unnecessary, and that he supported a path to citizenship for illegals.
Which Walker should I believe? The one who stated those positions before he was campaigning for the nomination….or the one who is now is now trying to win over conservatives?
The problem was he evolved to weaker positions over a couple years to the Chamber of Commerce position on amnesty.
Then he gets wind of problems with conservatives while running for president and has a conversion moment.
Then a couple weeks later’gives the top communcations position in his campaign to Liz Mair, who is pro-amnesty and worked to advance it.
Then he fired her after a couple’days.
He appears all over the damn map and what Walker position are we to believe?
He has never liked dealing with the issue and in part I think it’s been why he’s flopped all over. He doesn’t want to be pinned down on it. He doesn’t want to be labeled as mean on this, b/c like most’republicans today he doesn’t know how to successfully deal with being called a meanie and a hater by the left.
I choose to believe the Walker who has had to refocus from being an upper-Midwest governor to American president. To prove me wrong, you'd have to dig up another conservative position that Walker took that ended in a liberal action.
Does Ted Cruz have the better position on illegal immigrants? Of course. But we still don't know what he would do with the 15 million illegals that are here now.
Does Scott Walker hold the same position on illegal immigrants as Jeb Bush? No. The article's conclusion is ridiculous and is not supported by the evidence presented in the same article.