Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Falling rig counts drive projected near-term oil production decline in 3 key U.S. regions
Energy Information Administration ^ | MARCH 17, 2015 | Energy Information Administration

Posted on 03/17/2015 9:56:07 AM PDT by thackney

EIA's most recent Drilling Productivity Report (DPR) indicates a change in the crude oil production growth patterns in three key oil producing regions: the Eagle Ford, Niobrara, and Bakken. The DPR estimates, which were issued on March 9 and cover the months of March and April, include the first projected declines in crude oil production in these regions since publication of the DPR began in October 2013. However, with production gains continuing in other regions, particularly the Permian, overall crude oil production in regions tracked by the DPR rose slightly in March to 5.6 million barrels per day. Total production in the DPR regions in April is expected to be virtually unchanged from its March level.

In any given month, there are new wells and legacy, or continuing, wells. Production from legacy wells declines over time, but recently the rate of decline in some regions has been increasing. This means that, in order for overall production to increase, operators must drill enough new wells to overcome the decline from legacy wells. As fewer wells are drilled, this decline becomes a significant challenge to overcome.

The recent decline in crude oil prices has led operators to reduce the number of rigs in use. DPR results show sharp decreases in rig counts in all regions, starting in January and February of this year. When producers make the decision to lay down some drilling rigs, they generally start by idling the older, least-efficient ones first. The effect on production depends on the productivity of the remaining rigs.

For example, falling crude oil prices during the 2008-09 recession led to decreases in rig counts, but not decreases in production. At that time, lower rig counts were more than offset by increases in the productivity of remaining rigs, as those more productive rigs required fewer days to drill and complete a well, had higher initial production rates, and were more able to drill multiple horizontal wells from a single pad. Because the base level of rig performance is so much higher now than several years ago, it is not clear that productivity gains will offset rig count declines to the same degree as in 2008-09.

The Permian region, where as late as December 2013 half the operating rigs were vertical rigs, still appears to be experiencing significantly larger productivity improvements than other DPR regions. In general, average production from a vertical well is significantly smaller than that from a horizontal well. As more vertical rigs are brought offline, the ratio of vertical to horizontal rigs in the Permian, which has only fallen below 1:1 in recent months, is coming closer to, but remains above, the vertical-to-horizontal rig ratio in the other DPR regions.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Colorado; US: North Dakota; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: bakken; eagleford; energy; oil; rigcount


1 posted on 03/17/2015 9:56:07 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Drilling Productivity Report
http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/pdf/dpr-full.pdf
March 2015

The seven regions analyzed in this report accounted for 95% of domestic oil production growth and all domestic natural gas production growth during 2011-13.


2 posted on 03/17/2015 9:57:51 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I’ve been looking at this type of curve for a long time. Coupled with some knowledge of production decline characteristics, drilling rig count, stripper production etc. I’d say this is the beginning of a cliff and it isn’t up.

But hey, what do I know about this kind of thing after nearly 40 years of oil and gas experience?


3 posted on 03/17/2015 10:19:48 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

This is an estimate of what is going to happen, in other words a WAG. My WAG is the production will drop off faster given the rapid decline in rig count. But again this is some wishfull thinking on my part as I am very dependent on my oil & gas income and a large part of my working interest is now in negative territory.


4 posted on 03/17/2015 10:35:32 AM PDT by Okieshooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Okieshooter

Part of the complication of predicting that, is there has been a growth in the number of shale wells that were drilled but not completed with the hydraulic fracturing (where a lot of dollars are spent).

There could be an increase in production without additional drilling from these wells.

Also at this time, there is a growing re-fracturing effort on wells already in service but the information I’ve found on that is still sketchy.


5 posted on 03/17/2015 10:40:20 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Okieshooter

Also of note was the information released this week by Wood Mackenzie that as many as 3,000 wells have been drilled without being fracked. When prices do turn, that could become the lowest hanging fruit for new supply.

http://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Harold-Hamm-Dismisses-IEA-Shale-Prediction.html


6 posted on 03/17/2015 11:14:08 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson