[Usagi_yo]

Hey Ma! I think I've found where all the Birthers disappeared to.

They're astroturfing for Cruz. They have a ping tree and if you say something about Cruz that they don't like, , they'll ping each other and try and bully you.

Cruz Offers ObamaCare Replacement Law!

Sen. Cruz Introduces the Health Care Choice Act!

Do you understand irony now?

[MaxMax]

I dont care what you say about Cruz, you said something false, a lie.

[MaxMax]

Took you long enough. And cruz didnt say replacement, did he?

[Finny]

No, frankly, although I know what the word "irony" means, I fail to see what "irony" you see in the fact that Cruz has made it crystal clear that he wants to OBLITERATE Obamacare rather than replace it, while Scott Walker has remained pretty fuzzy except in that he thinks Obamacare is a mess; it seems to me that Walker just might have a "better replacement" in mind, but I don't know because as far as I can see, he hasn't said. Cruz, on the other hand, has been detailed and explicit in explaining his "solution" to the Obamacare disaster. You think that's "ironic"?????????

From the article you posted with your claims that Cruz has offered an "ObamaCare Replacement Law" --

Though Cruz offered the Health Care Choice Act to address some of the specific issues that will be raised if the Supreme Court rules against the Obama Administration regarding the exchanges, the senator still believes that "Every last word of Obamacare must be repealed. And while we continue that fight, we must also send bill after bill to the president's desk to stop its harmful effects."

Now, you, Usagi-yo, can continue to deceive yourself and call that the same as calling for a "replacement" to Obamacare. Is that the "irony" you refer to?

I have no idea. What I DO know is that you are doing a very poor job of explaining exactly what you mean by "irony" in the context of comparing Cruz's well-stated, crystal-clear approach to Obamacare (get rid of it) to Walker's fuzzy stance on it.

[Finny]

Like I said, either Ted Cruz is all about the negative or the Media is doing a good job hiding all of his visionary projects like his great visionary plan for Obamacare. Keep feeding the irony troll,

So, Usagi, please confirm or deny: In your view, a Republican candidate must have a "great visionary [REPLACEMENT] plan for Obamacare" or else that candidate is "all about the negative"?

Answer the question, please. Mostly, what in hell do you perceive as "irony" in this? What's "ironic" about Cruz wanting to obliterate Obamacare and make it LEGAL for people to deal with health insurance on their own terms, while Walker has ZIP "stated positon" on something so cut-and-dried? You support Walker -- how is the contrast between Cruz and Walker here "ironic"??????????