Hmmm, no. I’ve read his obamacare replacement and his vision for Nasa. He still has a patina of negativity about him.
And I did say .... or the media isn’t giving him a fair shake ... to paraphrase.
We need vision and real hope for real change. Cruz is a bit deficit, he has a bit of work to shake that bad boy image or convert it to something useable out of the center right.
What would that be? I never heard Cruz say he has his own replacement.
What are you talking about?
You said it, now back it up please. Or did you lie? I want to read what you've read.
It's very important that false information about Any candidate is not spread around.
Please back up your statement or retract it. I'll wait for your answer.
USAGI (defending Scott Walker): I’ve read [Cruz's] obamacare replacement .... He still has a patina of negativity about him.
What Usagi really means is that he read an article about Cruz's position on Obamacare that has the word "Replacement" in the headline. Usagi is apparently unaware that what he was reading about wasn't actually an "obamacare replacement" but a combined plan to OBLITERATE Omabacare and to provide legislation in the meantime that would PROTECT AMERICANS AGAINST any parts of Obamacare that the courts fail to challenge and overrule.
The "patina of negativity" that Usagi perceives around Cruz is one thing -- for many, that patina is undoubtedly there and real, but then again, I perceive a much greater "patina of negativity" about Walker the more I learn about him. So ... any "patina of negativity" is entirely subjective, whereas it is entirely OBJECTIVE whether a candidate (Romney, for example) aspired/aspires to create a full "replacement" for Obamacare to "fix" the imaginary problem, or whether a candidate takes the position that government IS the problem and to repeal Obamacare in its entirety and restore freedom to Americans to deal with health care on their own terms and in a free market.
The difference between the two is PROFOUND, and apparently flies way over Usagi's head.