You too are being evasive.
I didn't say anything about "bringing in the "Muslim Brotherhood". Not my question.
If someone is sympathetic and supportive of terrorism and has questionable views regarding terrorism, would you support Walker hiring them as their spokesperson?
Nice straw man argument. I already answered your question. And frankly it’s a ridiculous one. Obviously, no one wants a terrorist supporter in the WH, but are you insinuating that the staffer is a terrorist supporter now? Seriously? That’s completely irrational. Political consultants, comms shops, PR people, etc... are also known as “hired guns” (not terrorists’ guns, btw) They represent the views of their clients. Not the other way around.