Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton's Deleted Emails Were Individually Reviewed After All, Spokesman Says
abc ^
| 3-15-15
| SHUSHANNAH WALSHE and LIZ KREUTZ SHUSHANNAH WALSHE More From Shushannah ยป LIZ KREUTZ More From Liz
Posted on 03/15/2015 8:03:19 PM PDT by doug from upland
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
I'm pretty sure that if you tell the truth, you are not going to have to worry about and wonder what you said. The story will always be the same.
To: doug from upland
Here is a personal one she deleted.
2
posted on
03/15/2015 8:06:44 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: All
Maybe this is even worse. If they actually read every one, there is no danger that a damaging one would slip through.
3
posted on
03/15/2015 8:07:10 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Obama and the leftists - destroying our country one day at a time)
To: doug from upland
Hillary’s Spokesperson. Yeah, they read the blogs and then came back and changed their story. Horse Poop, that all we get from the Clintons
To: doug from upland
5
posted on
03/15/2015 8:09:26 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: doug from upland
LOL. I smell “Steph-ina-lotta-poop”.
6
posted on
03/15/2015 8:10:26 PM PDT
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(The White House is now known as "Casa Blanca".)
To: doug from upland
Hogwash. The Arkansas Razorback mascot is a pig, a hog in the vernacular.
7
posted on
03/15/2015 8:10:52 PM PDT
by
Fungi
(Evolution is piece by piece over billions of years. At what point did a precursor become a human?)
To: doug from upland
The emails were individually reviewed after all, lied Hillary! spokesmetrosexual Nick “Ain’t Got No D*ck” Merrill...
8
posted on
03/15/2015 8:17:55 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
To: doug from upland
I dunno.
For some real strange reason, I do not believe them.
*Nixon’s missing minutes redux*
9
posted on
03/15/2015 8:18:05 PM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: doug from upland
I call bull-sh$t !
65k e-mails ?
Some\most were probably an e-mail thread.
If any business was mixed with personal she had to keep the email.
They had to look at ALL the e-mails individually to make the determination.
How long does it take to read through 65k emails ?
By how many people ?
This could not have been done by an intern or hiring somebody off the street, as somebody with superior knowledge would have to make decision to keep or adios..
10
posted on
03/15/2015 8:18:57 PM PDT
by
stylin19a
(obama = Eddie Mush)
To: doug from upland
11
posted on
03/15/2015 8:20:08 PM PDT
by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: doug from upland

The doormat is unfit for dog catcher.
12
posted on
03/15/2015 8:20:33 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: doug from upland
More likely your post #3 is correct.
13
posted on
03/15/2015 8:21:27 PM PDT
by
The_Media_never_lie
(The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
To: doug from upland
Let’s see— 55K plus of the submitted emails AND the 6oK or so of the not submitted “edited” emails. At an average of
one email say per a minimum of two- four minutes each comes to.....230,000 to 460,000 minutes or 3833 to 7,666 hours or
160 to 319 days (if one could go 24 hours a day continuously).
How many people would this take who were even security cleared to this. Or not?
What a GD blown up ridiculous self serving obvious lie.
14
posted on
03/15/2015 8:21:35 PM PDT
by
John S Mosby
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: stylin19a
Fairly quickly if you use a computer to do it.
15
posted on
03/15/2015 8:23:17 PM PDT
by
dhs12345
To: doug from upland
Search terms.... already proven to be a non-compliant near useless means to screen emails. This from the experts in security.
16
posted on
03/15/2015 8:23:18 PM PDT
by
John S Mosby
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: doug from upland
Lying then or lying now? Either way it doesn’t matter: they’re liars.
17
posted on
03/15/2015 8:24:05 PM PDT
by
Ray76
(Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
To: stylin19a
Rough calculations at my post #14 here. It’s a hell of a lot of time working continuously. No 10 humans could do it, especially not if each was a thread of email back and forths.
18
posted on
03/15/2015 8:25:11 PM PDT
by
John S Mosby
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: doug from upland
no explanation for why it took so long to clarify their deletion process Simple. They had to run polls on all of their stories before they could decide which one to use.
19
posted on
03/15/2015 8:25:23 PM PDT
by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation Continues)
To: doug from upland
Things that are hard to believe. A team of lawyers gets together and decides to write a 9-page response to “the e-mail scandal”. In this 9-page response, the never once mention that they actually READ the e-mails.
Then someone points out that not reading the e-mails, and then deleting them would likely be a felony.
And suddenly, we find out the team of lawyers DID read the e-mails, they simply “forgot” to mention that in their 9-page response.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson