[OneWingedShark]

It is 52 that calls for it to be pointed out that as you work against Cruz, that you are part of what is left of the Ron Paul crew.

I like how adherence to a consistent interpretation of Natural Born Citizen is portrayed as work against Cruz — perhaps you would like to illustrate more areas in which the Constitution must bend to your whims?

It's also quite interesting that you equate liking Ron Paul (implicitly, on any level) to a sort of slanderous label.

Here's a question, in Post 65 DiogenesLamp agrees with my evaluation that the congress [and Judicial] cannot define natural born citizen — does that make him a Ron Paul devotee?

[ansel12]

I like how one of the few remainders of the Ron Paul nut crew, and someone that has admitted to being a troll, has found a way to attack Ted Cruz in the 2016 election, by using the arguments that didn’t work against our two term sitting president, that this conservative would be replacing.

[DiogenesLamp]

Here's a question, in Post 65 DiogenesLamp agrees with my evaluation that the congress [and Judicial] cannot define natural born citizen — does that make him a Ron Paul devotee?

I assure you, I have no use for Ron Paul, and likewise no use for Rand Paul either.

I'm more of a Burkean conservative. My position on Cruz is that his eligibility is a moot point and this entire issue is just academic. If Barack Obama can hold the office, pretty much anybody can, and Article II is mostly irrelevant.

I think Ted Cruz is one of our best potential candidates and I would be happy to vote for him.