Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bigbob

is this a joke? yes, OU appears to have violated the first amendment by expelling two students for engaging in hate speech. but you think Boren should come out and defend the “right” of whites to chant “n*****”?

good Lord


27 posted on 03/11/2015 7:30:24 AM PDT by ghost of stonewall jackson (An amateur built the Ark; professionals built the Titanic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: ghost of stonewall jackson

Boren’s initial statements were just that: strong condemnation of what was said, but also a validation that Constitutional protections had to be respected.

I was VERY surprised at how quickly he followed that up with the expulsion order. I figured the kids were going to get expelled, but only after mass protests on campus. I’m guessing that someone showed Boren the cost benefit analysis of having to settle lawsuits in the mid to high seven figure range vs having the campus turn into Ferguson West.


31 posted on 03/11/2015 7:40:15 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: ghost of stonewall jackson

That’s not how I read it at all. It appears that the post was clearly saying that the president should condemn what was said, but defend the right of the students to say it. Of course, the chant was offensive speech, but offensive speech is included in the First Amendment’s right to free speech. We would not need a First Amendment if it were only intended to protect inoffensive speech. It is precisely BECAUSE it is intended to protect offensive speech that the First Amendment is necessary.


37 posted on 03/11/2015 8:01:35 AM PDT by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson