Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SubMareener
The last two sentence are a statement by Ventura attorney.. and nowhere in the article does it state “No one is contesting that finding”. .

just because a third parties contend the fine was excessive even if what Kyle wrote was false is not the same as saying it was false

I can get accused of stealing a piece of candy and get sentenced to 10 years.....

If anything the excessive fine in the end argues for a bias jury in the first place Other can then certainly arguing in court that 10 years for stealing a piece of candy is cruel excessive punishment ....

Along with me making an appeal I didn't steal the candy and the jury found wrong..

Or do you content all jurors are never wrong?

24 posted on 03/10/2015 9:00:06 PM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: tophat9000

See the National Review article http://www.nationalreview.com/article/384176/justice-jesse-ventura-was-right-his-lawsuit-j-delgado It appears that the jury came to a reasonable verdict on the facts.


25 posted on 03/10/2015 9:10:43 PM PDT by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson