just because a third parties contend the fine was excessive even if what Kyle wrote was false is not the same as saying it was false
I can get accused of stealing a piece of candy and get sentenced to 10 years.....
If anything the excessive fine in the end argues for a bias jury in the first place Other can then certainly arguing in court that 10 years for stealing a piece of candy is cruel excessive punishment ....
Along with me making an appeal I didn't steal the candy and the jury found wrong..
Or do you content all jurors are never wrong?
See the National Review article http://www.nationalreview.com/article/384176/justice-jesse-ventura-was-right-his-lawsuit-j-delgado It appears that the jury came to a reasonable verdict on the facts.