Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Maceman

so ... if ethanol didn’t exist ... would they lose 47% or would that 47% go in a different dirsection ?


24 posted on 03/09/2015 8:55:08 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but, they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: knarf

About one-third of corn used for ethanol ends up as cheap animal food anyway. Ethanol actually subsidizes that animal feed.

Corn acres had been declining for decades until ethanol. Iowa will grow corn regardless of ethanol. Areas outside the Corn Belt will be the producers that cut back.


52 posted on 03/09/2015 10:31:40 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson