I answered you question.
But you have not answered mine.
Why are you ignoring it?
Who is going to enforce Gowdy’s email supeona?
Yes, you admitted that you do not know that Gowdy has the legal authority to seize personal property. But that didn’t stop you from attacking him anyway. Thank you for at least being honest about that.
Congressional investigators apparently have very limited means to “enforce” a subpoena (to which I, as a limited government conservative, would argue is a VERY good thing!). But, please excuse me for missing your point. What does “subpoena enforcement” have to do with supporting your attacks against Rep. Gowdy?
Gowdy has known from the beginning that a resolution to Hillary-evidence, especially in the form of emails, will not likely come to the light of day under this administration or the next election.
No one can enforce the Gowdy subpoena but the judge who issues it. The Justice Department will then put a deadbolt on the collection of any emails requested of him or his department.
The IRS only recently, through the work of some authorized individual associated with maybe the Inspector General, was able to physically find the warehoused emails of Lois Lerner. Besides, Hillary has surely shined up and scrubbed her wooly involvement that any emails would reveal, or the dupes on the Accountability Review Board should have had her crap vetted way back then.
Now how is anyone going to get into Hillary’s hen house in Chappaqua on their own volition like that and live to tell about it?
Besides, Gowdy has said a dozen times that he wants nothing from the blasted server but emails related to Libya and Benghazi. It is up to the government to kick the door down and that brings us back to the Justice Department.
I have a feeling Bill Clinton is enjoying this, actually, seeing the old girl tangled up in her own machine threads and off his case.