Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sgt_Schultze

[[There should only be eight voting. Former Solicitor Kagan previously advocated FOR this law on behalf of the current defendant. She should have recused herself.]]

If this is true, then why aren’t the republican SC justices demanding she do so? I think you’re right, but I’m puzzled why they are allowing her to be seated in this atgument


19 posted on 03/06/2015 9:50:55 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Bob434

... If this is true, then why aren’t the republican SC justices demanding she do so? I think you’re right, but I’m puzzled why they are allowing her to be seated in this atgument
********************
I believe the issue regarding Kegan arose the first time SCOTUS ruled on Obamacare. I recall that only the individual Justice can recuse themself from a case... no one else can force the recusal. ....Kegan has no morals.


61 posted on 03/06/2015 7:49:21 PM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson