[stephenjohnbanker]

That is NOT a mixture of good and bad, just bad!

[RGF]

Wonderful, so we have no law, simply what the next king thinks the law should be.

[Forward the Light Brigade]

Roberts is in Obama’s hip pocket. They will vote any way he want and do it twice on Sunday. Watch—If Obama wanted to close Congress and rule by decree—they would uphold it as Constutional. The Fix is in—The SS Couty is comprimised. Watch as they let Illegals vote and reparations to all blacks for slavery.

[Tallguy]

Worst of both worlds: 1) it allows ACA to remain Law, subject to the whim of the next president. And (2) it codifies a shift in authority from the constitutionally elected representatives to unelected bureaucrats.

What’s not to hate?

[henkster]

It is very bad. Any reasoning along these lines guts the Constitution and ends the principle of separation of powers. All effective power would be vested in the President, and Congress and the Courts are either fig leaves or rubber stamps (choice of metaphor is up to you). In any event, an opinion based on this reasoning means and end to the Rule of Law.

Well, actually the Rule of Law ended with Wickard v. Filburn. National Associaion of Manufacturer's v. Sebelius was it's post-mortem, and King v. Burwell is the headstone.