Look at the attempted car bombing in NYC in 2010.
The left and their allies in the MSM started a talking points campaign claiming the TEA Party was a bunch of ultra violent, racist, right wing extremist, Tim McVeigh wannabes, out to overthrow the govt of the US.
Low and behold the car bomb was a fertilizer bomb like McVeigh used so Bloomberg said because it was a fertilizer bomb like McVeigh used it had to be the TEA Party since they were a bunch of Tim McVeigh wannabes.
The left started saying the TEA Party were terrorist and needed to be rounded up.
The IRS had started targeting the TEA Party a couple of months before demanding the names of everyone associated with TEA Party groups.
There is 4 possibilities with that attempted attack.
1. The dems orchestrated the news for the attack to blame the TEA Party.
2. The terrorist picked up on the dems talking points about the TEA Party from the news and “spontaneously” planned the attack to match the dems talking points.
3. The TEA Party actually did it.
4. It’s all just a coincidence.
We know the TEA Party didn’t do it.
From the OBL doc we know the news is 90% of the preparation for the battle so it’s not just a coincidence.
That leaves option 1 or 2.
The dems orchestrated the news for the attack or the terrorist picked up on the news and “spontaneously” planned the attack.
With Benghazi, setting it up to make it look like the right wing extremist had planned another October Surprise or the terrorist had picked up on the dems praising Peanuts Carter Hillary was flipping the question.
Dems collaborating with terrorist had been taken out of the 2 options and replaced with repubs collaborating with the terrorist.
Simple attorney trick.
bfl