Replies

Interesting it says Chief Justice Moore played no part in the ruling.

I have not read the entire ruliing but it seems seminal and substantial and certainly it sets up for a showdown with the US Supreme Court and especially that awful ranting opinion of Justice Kennedy.

But it is only one state. The ruling which appears quite well written can be used as a template by other states but the US Supreme Court will have the final say until the states assert Article V and amend the US Constitution.

And a marriage Amendment is not needed.

What is needed is a more broad amendment that restores state suffrage to Congress and includes an enabling clause to override the Supremacy Clause used by the Courts.

Here is an example of an amendment that the states can propose under Article V:

************************************************
AMENDMENT XXVIII

To redress the balance of powers between the federal government and the States and to restore effective suffrage of State Legislatures to Congress, the following amendment is proposed:

************************************************
Section 1.
A Senator in Congress shall be subject to recall by their respective state legislature or by voter referendum in their respective state.

Section 2.
Term limits for Senators in Congress shall be set by vote in their respective state legislatures but in no case shall be set less than twelve years or more than eighteen years.

Section 3.
Upon a majority vote in three-fifths of state legislatures, federal statutes and federal court decisions shall be overridden.
************************************************

I would strongly recommend the following must-see video be watched, consumed and studied:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdZuV8JnvvA

And I would strongly recommend you to urge your state senator and state representative, and the people that work for them, to view it.