Posted on 03/03/2015 3:50:55 AM PST by WhiskeyX
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used a personal e-mail account to exclusively conduct official business during her time at the State Department, a move that raises questions about access to the full archive of her correspondence, as well as the possibility that she violated federal law requiring official messages to be retained for the record.
The existence of the account was discovered by the House select committee investigating the deadly 2012 attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and was first reported by The New York Times.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
If they start with abuse of power, where do they end?
LOL! You’re right!
Maybe we should start referring to her as Hillary "Wikileaks" Clinton.
Using a private email address for national security emails is MORE than just a breach of protocol, it actually puts our nation at risk.
I must say, this is borderline criminal. At my corporation I would be fired if I sent business emails from or to my personal account....I’m speechless.
“Draws Scrutiny”????? IT IS ILLEGAL!
After 8 years in the White House, there’s no way to claim ignorance (as if that’s mitigating anyway). This was clearly willful and deliberate.
But it’ll be brushed under the rug by a compliant media, like all the Clinton dirty-laundry.
But Hillary is strangely silent---perhaps the reason is she has to double-check w/ all her donors first---she can't say anything that will interrupt the flow of hundreds of millions into the Clinton Foundations.
In fact, the 2016 Democrat candidate is not Hillary---its thousands of Clinton Foundations' donors---govts, corporations, companies, global govt agencies, non-profits, foundations, and individuals----lying in wait to get pay back---with interest.
These financial deals have turned the Clinton Foundations into illegal Super-Pacs---affording the Clintons tons of financing for their endless political ambitions....there's 200 paid staff on-board The Clinton Make-A-Buck Express as we type.
Clinton donors are lying in wait for payback...... for Hillary to wield her presidential pen to unleash zillions of tax dollars.....with interest.
(more Clinton finagling below)
CLINTON POLITICS AND PROFITEERING: Boeing CEO questioned on donations to Clinton foundation Boeing's CEO faced pointed questions about its charitable donation to the tax-exempt Clinton Foundation in the same year that then-Secy of State Hillary Clinton advocated on Boeing's behalf on an official tax-financed trip to Russia.
(POSTER'S NOTE: Some might say it was common to advocate for US business---but then very few previous advocates had a presidential campaign on the burner----nor did they have three tax-exempt foundations panhandling donations from corporations.)
David Almasi, shareholder and representative of the National Center for Public Policy Research think tank, asked Boeing the question, and gave an indication of the kinds of challenges that companies could face as Hillary weighs a run for president. Dozens of major corporations have made charitable donations to the Clinton Foundation in recent years.
Almasi called the Boeing donation a "clear conflict of interest" that seemed "reckless and unnecessary." (According to Almasi's notes, CEO McNearney called an implication that the donation might have been legally questionable "beyond the pale.")
Boeing contributed $900,000 to the Clinton family foundation (there are three) just months after Clinton had traveled to Russia, where she made what she called a "shameless pitch" for a state-owned Russian company to buy Boeing passenger jets. Boeing won the $3.7 billion Russian contract in June 2010. (Some facts excerpted from wahingtonpost.com report.)
==============================================
Secy of State Hillary's incessant globe-trotting raises new questions about her motives....since it is well-known her global travels contributed nothing to US foreign policy.
Hefty corporate donations to the Clintons' tax-exempt foundations are nice...... but exchanging valuable US ntl security info for campaign contributions......that could really add up.
(CACKLE) and to think the airheaded State Dept sorority sister could not name EVEN ONE of Hillary's accomplishments at State?
===========================================
And just who cleaned out the State Dept's bank accounts? News reports say the State Department announced it has "no idea" what happened to $6 billion used to pay its contractors..... a special “management alert” warned “significant financial risk and a lack of internal control at State has led to billions of unaccounted dollars over the last six years....under Hillary's watch.
===================================================
NY based-Corning’s political action committee gave $33,000 to Hillary and her leadership PAC. Then-Sen Hillary in return showered Corning with earmarks, mandates, and regulations that forced or paid businesses to use Corning products, such as specialty tailpipe filters and catalysts. The New York Times covered this dynamic in a 2006 article headlined “Company Finds Clinton Useful, and Vice Versa.”
The Times reporters wrote: “In April 2003, a month after Corning's political action committee gave $10,000 to her re-election campaign, Mrs. Clinton announced legislation that would provide hundreds of millions in federal aid to reduce diesel pollution, using, among other things, technology pioneered by Corning.” Most conspicuously, Corning executives switched from backing her Republican opponent Rick Lazio in October 2000 to flooding her campaign with donations. A few weeks later, her husband’s administration issued an emissions rule that a local reporter called “a big Christmas present [dropped] in the lap of Corning Inc.”
========================================================
<><> In 2006, Barr Laboratories CEO made his first contribution to Hillary's reelection....and within a month, Hillary announced she would block GWB's Food and Drug Administration nominee until the agency made Barr’s “Plan B” morning-after contraceptive available over the counter. In those same days, she introduced legislation to subsidize Plan B.
<><> In 2008, Barr Executive Vice President Frederick J. Killion donated $1,000 to her campaign one day after Clinton introduced another bill to prop up Plan B.
<><> The Washington Post reported in 2014 that Clinton has "functioned as a powerful ally for Boeing’s business interests at home and abroad," while Boeing "invested resources in causes beneficial to Clinton’s public and political image."
<><> The Wall Street Journal also found a suspicious pattern of corporate giving. General Electric, Exxon Mobil, Microsoft and Boeing were among 60 companies that lobbied the State Department during her tenure and donated a combined $26 million to the family foundation, the paper reports.
<><> It found several cases where her lobbying of foreign governments on behalf of specific American firms came just before or after those firms made hefty donations to the Clinton Foundation or another nonprofit she created, Vital Voices.
<><> Walmart gave to both groups, and to a separate fund Clinton established at the State Department. (Hillary served on the Arkansas-based company's board while her husband was Ark governor).
===============================================
The Clinton MO is to do a disappearing act when scandals loom---after it dies down, they then surface---as if nothintg happened.
She ONLY used her personal email for every bit of email communication.
She had NO government email address her entire time there, from what I read this morning.
...in case anyone was wondering if Trey Gowdy was making any progress.
Maybe she doesn’t want people to know she used a reagan.com email.
It is a total and ongoing NATIONAL SECURITY BREACH!
Even a junior executive knows it's unprofessional and courting trouble.
How can you know which Hildy is which. One who is a southern talker, one who is Margaret Thatcher, or the one who screams at Jews, or the one who kills Americans. And, of course, the one who calls for abortions on demand at the United Nations building. “Oh, what difference does it make!”
We are not allowed to use private emails at work. We are required to use only official emails.
If the public gets too noisy about this, I’m sure that government workers will have to be trained on allowable email usage (again). Every time a politician commits an ethical breach, the government workers have to pay for it with more restrictions on their activities and more training. The politicians, however, happily continue to commit ethics violations. They’re the ones who need the training, and should have to operate under the same restrictions that they impose on the workers.
Why did your other thread get pulled?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.