[Ken H]

Ken H, equating Cruz trying pot to Murder, Rape, and Robbery.

You left out this important follow-up exchange => http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3254122/replies?c=22

Here's the gist of it =>

______________________________________________________________

Ken H: So should we just give a pass to someone who committed murder as a young man? What other crimes should we overlook?

OWS: By what right is it a crime?

Ken H: There's a rule that on every pot thread, an abysmally stupid statement must be made on behalf of the prohibitionist side.

It looked like no one was going to step up, so I did the honors. [end excerpt]

________________________________________________________________

What say you now?

[MaxMax]

I proved my point. Just because you backtracked due to your post means nothing.
If you had another meaning to the post in point you would've used the /s tag,
or pointed it out in the same post, but you didn't. Funny how that one stuck with me.

Much like the drive by MSM does things, get the slander out first, backtrack later
if to many complain.

Nice try on the spin. Care to answer my Questions now?

Would you vote for a Conservative Candidate who is against MJ legalization?
You're humble reply would be most appreciated.

[OneWingedShark]

I still say there's not Constitutional basis for the federal regulation of drugs — there is no amendment delegating such powers as there was with the 18th, therefore to call any of the prohibitions of the War on Drugs legitimate is to lend your support to the usurpation of power by the federal government.

As to Ken H's statements, you'd have to ask him.