“Here’s the truth of the matter: I don’t want to be politically correct. I don’t care about being politically correct at this point.
“President Obama, You don’t love America. If you really did love America, you would call ISIS what it really is: an assault on Christianity, an assault on America and downright hate for the American values that our country holds. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion and every single thing that our country stands for.”
He adds, “I hope that one day people will get enough guts to speak out against your downright hatred for this nation.”
Referring to ISIS, he said, “When they kill innocent Americans that have done no wrong except report on what is their constitutional right as journalists and you do nothing about it, you don’t care about their lives. You could care less!
“But here’s what you need to realize: here in America, we don’t back down to terrorists. We fight them on their own battleground and we annihilate them till the very end.
“Here in America, we don’t allow the government to take away what we work for but we continue to work harder so that we may continue to succeed.”
Pearson is executive director of a group called “Young Georgians in Government.”
His Facebook page says he is “committed to fighting for conservative principles and engaging young people in the political process.”
“Most young people really don’t have an interest in government or politics, but we need to pique that interest, we need to make sure that they know, the decisions politicians make are going to affect them,” the student told ABC 6 in a profile story last December.
It's not really that. Obama wants to fill the internet with drivel. The reason why the providers want to block streaming video is to allow content to get through without building expensive high bandwidth infrastructure. By forcing providers to take all streaming video from Netflix and Google (the only players that matter), the government fills the internet with useless drivelous video. There is nothing more useless than netflix and youtube (e.g. compared to our discussion for example).
One could argue that "neutrality" should apply to video, but obviously it cannot, there is not enough bandwidth to let everyone stream whatever they want. A similar argument is that the providers could censor content (wrong, other than throttling streaming video). An analogous argument is that the government could censor content. That is wrong. Tor will allow any content through with hidden servers, etc. Nobody can censor content, the Chinese try 24x7 and basically fail (other than cutting off access or reducing their internet to AOL for China).
To make it clear, without my rural provider throttling streaming video I get no access (zero bandwidth) to do anything.
That’s it! He wants to control the internet to kill any discussion that puts him or his government in a bad light. Can you believe we’re having a discussion in these terms in America 2015?! A president who fears not only information but its distribution network that enlightens citizens and points out nefarious and illegal government actions? This may as well be Soviet Russia 1925, with the only opinions permitted are those that agree with the government and its minions. I begin to see why the douchebag media continuously covers and enables 0bama, he’s doing his best to restore them to being the sole provider of public information!