Skip to comments.
ISIS Turns to Chemical Weapons As It Loses Ground in Iraq
Fiscal Times ^
| February 22, 2015
| BY RIYADH MOHAMMED, The Fiscal Times
Posted on 02/22/2015 12:05:52 PM PST by Jim Robinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: All
2
posted on
02/22/2015 12:06:38 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: Jim Robinson
Iraq has no WMDs, doncha know.
3
posted on
02/22/2015 12:06:51 PM PST
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
To: combat_boots
Iraq has no WMDs, doncha know. Well.............not anymore.
4
posted on
02/22/2015 12:09:21 PM PST
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: Jim Robinson
I thought that chemical weapons were ‘illegal’ and that the full power of the United Nations Members would be brought upon anyone who uses them.
5
posted on
02/22/2015 12:09:25 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: Jim Robinson
Lol. The same newspaper that called Bush a liar for claiming there were WMD in Iraq. You can not make this stuff up!
6
posted on
02/22/2015 12:09:48 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
(E)
To: combat_boots
Ah, but now that it would serve obama, Eastasia Iraq has always had chemical weapons, Citizen
7
posted on
02/22/2015 12:09:50 PM PST
by
null and void
(People who deny history are trying to recreate it.)
To: Jim Robinson
But...but...but..Sadaam *had* no chemical weapons! Dirty Harry (and others) gave us his word!
To: Jim Robinson
There’s no doubt these ISIS terrorists will use WMD if they have them, and we have people in 0bama’s administration saying not to kill these savages, give them employment. *shaking head*
9
posted on
02/22/2015 12:15:20 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
To: jwalsh07
Or they kept saying Saddam and his buddies did not have ties to terror, but look at them now... Same thing with Obama.
10
posted on
02/22/2015 12:20:07 PM PST
by
lavaroise
(A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall no)
To: UCANSEE2
11
posted on
02/22/2015 12:20:35 PM PST
by
nesnah
(Liberals - the petulant children of politics)
To: combat_boots
That’s exactly right. The US press said so. So how in the world could ISIS have a chemical engineer from Saddam’s Iraq with chem weapon expertise? Impossible!
12
posted on
02/22/2015 12:21:36 PM PST
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
To: Jim Robinson
SH in Iraq had many chemical weapons. Many of which were run into hiding in Syria, and probably other places, when the US attack was obvious. This is no surprise. ISIS will do whatever it wants without any fear of meaningful consequences (military might - all they understand).
Total lack of US leadership, will, and dedication to stopping genocide will lead to many more deaths, from various causes. The US needs a true President badly.
13
posted on
02/22/2015 12:21:58 PM PST
by
EagleUSA
(Liberalism removes the significance of everything")
To: Jim Robinson
I’m sure that is another red line.
14
posted on
02/22/2015 12:23:05 PM PST
by
JohnBrowdie
(http://forum.stink-eye.net)
To: jazusamo
I hear there are some great job openings in the chemical weapons factories. I have it on good authority that those high-paying jobs will tamp down their violent tendencies.
15
posted on
02/22/2015 12:24:13 PM PST
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
To: Jim Robinson
But, but, we were told that Syria used chemical weapons against their citizens and that no terrorist group in the region had chemical weapons or the knowledge to make them..
The media and John Kerry wouldn’t lie to us again, would they?
16
posted on
02/22/2015 12:24:28 PM PST
by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: lavaroise
Probably would have known this almost a decade ago if the Bush Administration hadn’t caved to the Dims over keeping the captured Iraqi documents in the first public domain.
17
posted on
02/22/2015 12:24:34 PM PST
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
To: Jim Robinson
There are no chemical weapons - the DEMOCRATS told us it was all a George Bush lie.
I am against sending any US troops to Iraq to die for Obama.
18
posted on
02/22/2015 12:28:29 PM PST
by
Cowboy Bob
(Isn't it funny that Socialists never want to share their own money?)
To: Jim Robinson
deep in the article .”With the fall of massive areas in northern and western Iraq, ISIS was able to control a key area north of Baghdad that used to produce chemical weapons under Saddam. However, the site was empty. The UN inspection teams had destroyed and cleared the site completely from the industrial tools and the main materials that could be used to make chemical or biological weapons, according to the UN teams reports.”
19
posted on
02/22/2015 12:30:20 PM PST
by
wiggen
(#JeSuisCharlie)
To: Jim Robinson
Nah can’t be..we have been told over and over and over again that Bush lied, those critters don’t have chemical weapons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson