So the judge said, “yeah, the right to bear arms exists - for the people. But what does that have to do with you? You’ve self-identified as a mere corporate person, and shown up in a corporate court that has nothing to do with rights. So stop talking about rights - this court doesn’t deal with rights, and anyway, you already surrendered them or you wouldn’t be here.”
Please show us where it says that in the decision. I do not think you will fined it. It would be nice if what you say is true, because it would indicate that the courts followed a nice set of rules. But I see no indication that they do.
I just did, in the part of my comment you didn't quote.
It would be nice if what you say is true, because it would indicate that the courts followed a nice set of rules.
Yes, wouldn't that be nice? It would mean people could actually understand what's really going on, instead of championing their ignorance as knowledge.
But I see no indication that they do.
You see what you want to see, and you don't see what you don't want to see.