While I support Israel, having a foreign head of state address Congress with out the support of the US head of state is not a good precedent to set. That is not Congresses role.
It wasn’t house speaker Nancy Pelosi’s role to got sit in Syria president Assad’s lap but se did...
It wasn’t the Baghdad trio’s to go meets Saddam Hussein and speak before the regime’s parliament but they did.
And it wasn’t John Kerry’s role to get involved in peace treaties with the North Vietnamese but there he went right into Madame Binh’s bedroom...
If the U.S. had an actual president instead of a terrorist-sympathizing, Marxist usurper, I might agree with you (though this is not without precedent). Obama IS the very "domestic enemy" that elected officials take oaths to defend against. I think hosting a speech that makes him pouty is mild compared to what Congress should be doing to him.
Your opinion is very wrong headed indeed. You know how that Islam is on the rise worldwide and how the fool potus is mishandling the danger of Islamic terrorists and you would have the co equal dept of Congress cow-tow to the evil executive liberal loony run communist branch.