Call me crazy, but it might help if you actually read the article. The title is provocative, as titles often are, but it’s not about what you think.
Call me crazy but I actually DID read the article. And Amazingly it doesn't even begin to prove the premise in the title. It is about Judicial Review and it is about whether the Governors mentioned would follow the law/Constitution.
Here is something you might consider. There is no prerequisite that requires a Presidential Candidate to qualify for the office in which following the law while he is a Governor is mandatory.
See the Constitution is pretty self explanatory on who is Qualified to be President. Its why the title AND the Article is a laugher. Just because the article comes from a supposedly Conservative publication does not make it canon of the Conservative movement AND bad writing is bad writing. If you want to be taken seriously then don't title an article with a premise that you don't being to prove with the following article.
Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.