Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

I wonder if he looked first at the Simpson/Mazzoli Act, and researched it further to get to the Administrative Procedure Act. I’m also hoping that he is on solid ground.


18 posted on 02/18/2015 9:01:02 AM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Enterprise; P-Marlowe; txhurl

Simpson/Mazzoli is very clear, but it also specific to employers and social security access. That is valid concern when employing illegals, so it was added back when Simpson/Mazzoli was written.

The huge point in Simpson/Mazzoli, though, is that Congress intentionally with foresight imagined a president using executive action to circumvent Congressional law. That’s a stunning provision all by itself. But they also saw it happening in this area of illegal amnesty, and required it be subject to the Congress approving it.

If the Admin Procedure Act says essentially the same thing only in broader terms, then what we have is a legislative check on the president’s so-called ability to rule by executive orders.

Congress has foreseen such lawlessness and ruled it out of order, I hope.


21 posted on 02/18/2015 9:07:33 AM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson