To: cotton1706
I have not yet had an opportunity to read the 120 page opinion but I had the impression that the holding was far broader than this article implies in which the judge found that the agency's actions were themselves unconstitutional as a usurpation of Article I powers rather than any improper failure to adhere to procedural requirements for hearings.
Can anybody straighten me out?
12 posted on
02/18/2015 4:35:48 AM PST by
nathanbedford
("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
To: nathanbedford
14 posted on
02/18/2015 4:40:49 AM PST by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: nathanbedford
20 posted on
02/18/2015 5:04:38 AM PST by
Ray76
(Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson