Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cotton1706
I have not yet had an opportunity to read the 120 page opinion but I had the impression that the holding was far broader than this article implies in which the judge found that the agency's actions were themselves unconstitutional as a usurpation of Article I powers rather than any improper failure to adhere to procedural requirements for hearings.

Can anybody straighten me out?


12 posted on 02/18/2015 4:35:48 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

nb, there is an excellent article here which reviews the ruling:

http://www.nationalreview.com/node/398820/print


14 posted on 02/18/2015 4:40:49 AM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

Here’s a link to the ruling, if you don’t already have it.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/255994877/Memorandum-Opinion-And-Order-Texas-v-United-States


20 posted on 02/18/2015 5:04:38 AM PST by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson