Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Times Editorial Board Falls For VPC “Gun Violence” Report
Bearing Arms ^ | 2-11-2015 | Bob Owens

Posted on 02/15/2015 9:40:51 PM PST by smokingfrog

The editorial board of the New York Times has shredded the last vestiges of their remaining credibility today as they uncritically parroted the findings of a faked gun violence “study” created by inebriated rhesus monkeys and/or Violence Policy Center (VPC) interns.

The report, “Concealed Carry Killers” is a recurrent propaganda report created by the Violence Policy Center, a small left-wing gun prohibitionist organization dedicated to undermining the basic human right to armed self-defense. The goal of the VPC is to turn Benjamin Franklin’s warning on its head, and trade essential liberty for the illusion of temporary security.

“Concealed Carry Killers” is an on-going Quixotic quest to give the public the impression that people who carry concealed firearms are a threat to society.

This is of course a tall order, as the 11+ million people who carry licensed concealed weapons in the United States have been vetted by their local, state, and national governments with deep background checks. While individual state qualifications vary, the general criteria is that concealed carriers may not have any felony convictions, nor many disqualifying misdemeanors. Concealed carriers are far more law-abiding than the average citizen, and many concealed carriers are better trained with firearms than local law enforcement officers, and are convicted of fewer violent crimes as well.

In order to demonize the practice of concealed carry, the Violence Police Center ran into the insurmountable hurdle of not being able to find a significant number of concealed carriers using their legally concealed weapons to commit violent crimes.

In order to pad their report, VPC was forced to: include incidents where concealed carry was in no way part of the alleged crime. include incidents where there wasn’t even a conviction, but just allegations of a crime. include unsubstantiated, apparently mythical “crimes” without a named victim or perpetrator.

(Excerpt) Read more at bearingarms.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: banglist; cc; ccl
This is a rehash of a similar report that was put out last year.

http://crimepreventionresearchcenter.org/2014/04/massive-errors-in-the-violence-policy-centers-concealed-carry-killers/

1 posted on 02/15/2015 9:40:51 PM PST by smokingfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Appearing on Lars Larson’s radio show on Thursday, February 12th from 6:21 to 6:30 PM, John Lott explained the reason that the VPC’s claims were false.

http://crimepreventionresearchcenter.org/2015/02/cprc-interviewed-on-the-lars-larson-show-to-discuss-the-latest-violence-policy-centers-false-claims-about-shootings-by-concealed-handgun-permit-holders/


2 posted on 02/15/2015 9:45:22 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Falls??

The NYT was probably the ghost writer of the “report “.


3 posted on 02/15/2015 9:56:27 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Why wouldn’t the NYT fall for the VPC “Gun Violence” Report. They’re in bed together. Joined as it were like Siamese twins.


4 posted on 02/16/2015 12:00:55 AM PST by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Very good explanation by John Lott on how this report fabricates its “findings”.


5 posted on 02/16/2015 12:15:43 AM PST by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

They didn’t fall for the VPC report, they dove for it.


6 posted on 02/16/2015 4:21:17 AM PST by Blue Collar Christian (Ready for Teddy. Cruz, that is. Texas conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
It played into the narrative, so of course the NYT fell for it hook, line and stinker.
Yes, I know the line is hook, line and sinker, but this is the New York slimes…
7 posted on 02/16/2015 8:04:26 AM PST by Dr. Prepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson