While the Judge should not have attempted to enshrine a “right to privacy” in the Bill of Rights, for better or worse a very liberal United States Supreme Court once recognized its existence.
What I think Napolitano is doing is making “sauce for the gander” an argument to use against the statists. The people who argue for “right to abortion” as being an extension of “right to privacy” are hypocrites if they don’t condemn the government for its limitless disregard of the 4th Amendment by prying into all aspects of your life.
“While the Judge should not have attempted to enshrine a “right to privacy” in the Bill of Rights”
Yeah. Nor is it a natural or human right like freedom speech or religion.
I appreciate your comment, but I really couldn’t tell what he was trying to do in the article.